Written by: Dave Waller
Posted: 28/03/2012
Being a CEO might bring certain financial rewards,
but it can also be fraught with problems.
So just what qualities do you need
to do the job? Dave Waller
gets the view from the
Channel Islands.
When Portugal’s
António Horta-
Osório became CEO
of Lloyds Banking
Group in March last
year, he was seen as the
great hope for retail banking. Joining the statebacked
company with a package worth a cool
£8.3 million, he certainly looked the part – he
was charming, politically astute and made a
hobby of swimming with sharks. Yet all didn’t
go quite as planned. Eight months later, amid
rumours of going five days without sleep and
holding executive summits on Sundays, almost
£1bn was wiped off Lloyds’ market value as he
signed off with extreme fatigue and stress.
A rested Horta-Osório returned to the
hot seat in January this year, but his story
highlights the perils of being a micromanaging
CEO these days. “Life certainly
becomes more complicated when the
economy gets tough,” says Nick Winsor, CEO
of HS BC in Jersey. “Those pressures that every
company faces – growing revenue, managing
costs – are still crucial, only there’s lots more
stuff going on in the market place than there
would be otherwise.”
In Lloyds’ case, that means taxpayer
ownership, increased regulation and being
forced to sell off 632 branches to meet Europe’s
criteria on state aid. But it’s not just financial
heads who are having it tough. Against
the backdrop of a creaking Eurozone and
widespread austerity, CEO s across the board
are being required to increase output while
reducing costs, to introduce restructuring
and redundancies, and to ask for greater
levels of effort from vulnerable employees
who are themselves looking to their leaders
for reassurance that their futures are secure.
Whether at the head of a FTSE 100
company or leading a relatively small firm
in the Channel Islands, it’s a wonder the CEO
ever finds time to sleep at all. “Successful CEO s
will retain a level of high engagement across all
employees, and this is exhausting,” says Nicky
Little, Partner at leadership consultant Cirrus.
“They’ve got so many concerns, plus they need
to show a level of humility. The respected ones
are those who admit that ‘yes it is tough, but
I’m here for you’.”
It’d be hard to imagine the likes of Steve
Jobs saying that. The Apple pioneer may
have gone to the grave as one of history’s
most successful and iconic leaders [see page
46], but behind the quiet black turtlenecks,
his temperament was fiery and he remained
absolutely fixed on following his own vision.
Follow my leader
So which type of leader is best? Do troubled
times call for a more team-focused approach,
or is it time to cede control to a Jobs-style
autocrat, someone who’s willing to take the
company by the scruff of the neck in the
dogged pursuit of their own goals?
Graeme Millar came in to lead JT Group
in 2009, and he believes it’s a mistake to make
such a distinction between leaders. The best,
he says, exhibit a bit of everything. “They just
know how to use the right qualities at the right
time. There are times when talking is
important, and other times when you have to
make a decision. Of course you listen to all the
arguments and pros and cons – but ultimately
the buck stops with you.”
There has been a shift in perception of the
CEO role. The 1980s and 1990s were all about
Jobs-style individual, almost heroic, leadership
at the top. Now we see a more distributed
leadership across the business. Horta-Osório
seems to have learned that the hard way:
having made the mistake of centralising all
decision-making around himself, he returned
allowing trusted lieutenants to handle the
minutiae, while he oversaw overall strategy.
“A successful firm focuses on collective
success, not individual achievements,” says Andrew Dann, CI Managing Partner at Ernst
& Young. “The CEO is fundamental to getting
the tone right, setting consistent values and
acting as a role model to inspire and motivate
people. That makes them more engaged with
clients, which in turn leads to more work.
The people should come first, but the CEO has
a key role to play in ensuring that happens.”
So the CEO ’s job is to prime people to take
responsibility. Sounds easy enough. But first
they have to join a company and make the role
their own. This is often less than simple, yet
how it’s handled will have lasting effects.
Taking the reins
Research from US consultant FTI shows that
the initial reaction to a change of CEO can
have a longer-term effect on share price. Six
months after the new CEO started, companies
with a positive stock price reaction on day one
saw their stock outperform the market on
average by about 19 per cent six months after
the new CEO started. Those with unsuccessful
CEO transitions underperformed the market
by an average of nearly 17 per cent.
Little and Cirrus worked extensively with
Marks & Spencer when Stuart Rose stepped
down in May 2010. The company had lost
its figurehead, and stakeholders were
understandably concerned. Incoming CEO
Marc Bolland kept the market waiting till that
November before revealing his strategy. Yet
such confidence and clarity proved reassuring.
“There was pressure from the City, and he was
criticised, but he was very clear from the start
about what people could expect,” says Little.
“It worked in the end, but it was a gutsy move as people loved Rose so much.”
Of course, it’s probably no easier inheriting
a company that’s in trouble. When former
GE man Peter Löscher arrived at Siemens
in 2007, he was the first top executive in the
160-year history of the company to be hired
from outside. That’s a big ask, especially when
the company had just been fined $1.34bn for
bribery. Like Bolland, Löscher launched an
extensive tour around the business to listen
to what employees and clients had to say.
He also applied his own principles, including
what he defines as having a “true north – a
clear definition for myself of right and wrong”.
Graeme Millar’s tenure at JT began in less
intense but similarly uncertain times: shortly
after the States abandoned an attempt to sell
it. He came in and displayed a similar curiosity.
“The first few weeks were about meeting
customers, employees, the unions, the
government and the regulators,” he says.
“I asked two questions: what’s good about
what we’re doing, and what’s not good? After
that the job gets quite easy – do more of the
good, and less of the not-so-good.”
The message from the Channel Islands,
then, is that a successful CEO spends most of
their time listening to others but, like Löscher
or Jobs, is never be afraid to be themselves
either. “If someone asks you to the pub, you
wouldn’t run a risk assessment and write a
business case,” agrees Winsor. “Similarly, you
shouldn’t hang your own characteristics on the
coat hook and just go by the rule book when
you turn up at the office.”
Equally, as Lloyds’ Horta-Osório quickly
learned, a healthy CEO will leave the work
pressures on the peg before heading home.
A tale of two CEOs
Steve Jobs - Apple
Not many CEOs get sacked by the business they founded, only to come
back 12 years later and lead it to world domination. Jobs, however, did
just that. And there can be no clearer illustration of the effect of the right
CEO on a company’s fortunes than the career of the late Apple visionary.
Jobs was booted out by his board in 1985, and didn’t come back till 1997
– by which time Apple shares were at a low of $3.19 (they’d reached
$17.50 in 1992). Following his return, Apple earnings have grown nearly
35 per cent per year. The resurrection took a while to get up to speed,
as Jobs steered Apple back to his own vision, but soon there was no
stopping him: Apple’s stock price hit nearly $400 by the end of 2011.
Was Jobs too central to its success? Only time will tell…
Leo Apotheker - Hewlett-Packard
In February 2010, Apotheker resigned after two years leading business
software maker SAP, where he’d raised eyebrows by attempting to
push up prices. He joined HP in November 2010 with little hardware
experience, and HP’s stock subsequently lost nearly half its value.
Last August, Apotheker tried to pull several controversial moves: the
purchase of search-software firm Autonomy for a jaw-dropping $10.3bn,
the discontinuation of the HP TouchPad, and the idea that HP should
spin off its once-dominant PC division. This didn’t go over well with
investors, who feared he might run the company into the ground. For the
second time in as many years, Apotheker stepped down after a short stint
as CEO, to be replaced by former eBay CEO Meg Whitman. Though it
wasn’t all a disaster – his severance package was worth around $13 million.
Reader Comments
No comments have been made on this post.