Investigation into “Ghost Jobs”, these jobs that do not exist

It’s the story of a modern paradox: while recruitment platforms are swamped with offers, candidates have never had so much difficulty getting an interview. Welcome to the era of “Ghost Jobs”, these phantom advertisements published by companies which, in reality, have no intention of hiring. In 2026, this phenomenon is no longer an anomaly, it is a strategy.

The ritual is the same for millions of people every morning. Black coffee, screen on, and endless scrolling on professional networks. A marketing executive testifies to his dismay after six months of searching: “ I applied to more than 200 offers that matched my profile exactly. Result ? 180 radio silences and around ten automatic refusals sent by AIs in the middle of the night. »

This testimony is not an isolated case. It illustrates a collateral victim of a systemic trend that distorts full employment statistics: Ghost Jobs.

1. The x-ray of a haunted market

The recent figures are dizzying. According to a cross-analysis of job market data and several recruitment platforms published in early 2026, nearly 30% of online job offers are “ghosts”. In the United States, out of 7.4 million job openings recorded in June 2025, only 5.2 million resulted in actual hiring. A gap of 2.2 million positions which are evaporating into nature.

In France, the trend follows a similar curve. A specialized study identifies around 338,000 ghost ads out of a sample of 1.3 million offers analyzed. Could the feeling of dynamism in the job market be a movie set?

2. Why do companies play with fire?

If the practice seems cruel for candidates, it responds to cold and calculated logic on the part of HR departments. The motivations are divided into three pillars:

  • “Talent Piping” (The permanent pool): Companies keep ads open to collect resumes continuously. The idea? Have a fresh database the day a “real” need arises. It’s preventative recruitment with disregard for candidates’ time.
  • The growth signal to investors: A company that is recruiting is a company that is doing well. Maintaining dozens of positions open, even during a hiring freeze, reassures shareholders and projects an image of strength in the face of competition.
  • Internal pressure: This is the dark side of management. According to a 2025 study, 62% of managers admit to publishing phantom offers to make their current employees understand that they are replaceable, or to calm those who complain about an overload of work by promising them fictitious reinforcements.

3. The sectors most affected: education and tech in the lead

Not all sectors are in the same boat. The phenomenon is particularly significant where tension is high or bureaucracy is heavy.

Sector “Ghosts” Offer Rate (Est. 2025-2026)
Government & Public Sector 60%
Education & Health 50%
IT / Tech 48%
Finance 44%
Hospitality / Catering <5%

In the hotel industry, if you cannot find staff, the establishment closes. In Tech or Finance, you can afford to let a “Senior Data Scientist” offer float for eight months just to “probe the market”.

4. AI: the particle accelerator

The emergence of generative artificial intelligence has acted as fuel. Today, an algorithm can generate, publish and update hundreds of job descriptions in seconds. On the candidate side, AI makes it possible to apply en masse. We are witnessing a bot war: corporate AIs are rejecting CVs written by candidate AIs for positions that do not exist.

This automation dehumanizes the process and creates a feeling of profound exhaustion. For experts, the cost is also psychological. “Institutionalized ghosting breaks the contract of trust between the employer and the future employee before the relationship even begins,” explains a labor sociologist.

5. How to spot a Ghost Job?

For job seekers, vigilance is now required. Here are the warning signs identified by professionals in the sector:

  1. Seniority: An offer published more than 30 days ago without “Urgent” mention is suspicious.
  2. The repetition: If you see the same ad every three months for a year, caution is advised.
  3. The vague description: Ghost offers are often very generic to cast as wide a net as possible.
  4. Lack of real contact: If no recruiter is identifiable and the link goes to an endless generic portal.

Towards necessary regulation?

Faced with this pollution of the labor market, voices are being raised to demand more transparency. In 2026, some platforms begin to penalize companies whose offers remain active for too long without any real recruiting activity.

In the meantime, the advice for candidates remains the same: favor the direct network and targeted applications. Because in the jungle of algorithms, the ghost is often the one who will never answer you.