Three years of podcast aids, a useful system with no structuring effect

Since 2021, the Ministry of Culture has devoted 500,000 euros per year to the support of the authors of native podcasts. Designed as an experimental device, this fund was aimed at financed sound writing, encourage new talents and diversify the editorial offer. Three editions supported 326 projects. The evaluation conducted by the General Inspectorate of Cultural Affairs (IGAC) highlights a paradox, if the aid supported writing, it has failed to transform creation into a real sector.

A real dynamic on the writing of podcasts

According to the IGAC, 79 % of the winners of 2021 and 67 % of those of 2022 finalized their work, against only 29 % and 21 % for unwitted candidates. The subsidy, between 3,000 and 5,000 euros, brought a framework and symbolic recognition which strengthened the motivation of the beneficiaries. Aid has also favored access to professional production, a quarter of the assisted projects have found a producer, against less than 10 % among non-Laurées.

A dissemination of projects still marginal assisted

Where the device shows its limits, it is in the visibility of the works. Only 29 % of the assisted projects were broadcast, often by public media like Radio France or Arte Radio. The creations resulting from this aid remain little present on the consumer platforms, dominated by a handful of titles which concentrate 95 % of listening. Even if the probability of being broadcast is two to three times stronger with aid, most of the funded production remains invisible to the public.

Already professionalized winners

Thought to promote emergence, aid has actually benefited mainly from already installed profiles. 85 % of the winners of the first two editions belong to the audiovisual field, authors, directors, journalists, producers. The majority is in the 30/49 age group, and a fifth has already received other scholarships or prices. On the geographical level, Île-de-France largely dominates, the ultramarine candidates representing less than 4 % in 2022 and only 1 % in 2023. The system thus reproduces the usual inequalities of access to cultural support with a strong Parisian concentration, graduates and already inserted in professional networks.

The economic model of podcasts always not found

IGAC assessment recalls the basic problem of the native podcast, which has not found a viable economic model. Attempts to pay paid, the advertising market remains unstable and undersized, and international platforms (Spotify, Apple) have withdrawn from direct funding. In this context, the weight of Radio France has been decisive but limits the place of independent producers. Help in writing therefore appears as a symbolic gesture, useful for upstream but unable to irrigate the sector.

What prospects for aid from the Ministry of Culture?

The IGAC recommends to refound the system in order to refocus creation assistance on a reduced number of more substantial financing projects, accompanied by professional support, as well as create selective production aid, covering up to 40 % of the costs of structuring projects and conditioned to a dissemination commitment. Finally, strengthen dissemination via public and associative radios. France must now decide whether it wants to treat the podcast as a real sector with a logic comparable to that of Técinéma or music – or maintain it as a marginal artistic laboratory, funded on the fringes but without solid economic prospects.

An unanswered strategic choice

Three years after the launch, the state recognized the podcast as a full -fledged cultural object. But the balance sheet highlights ambiguity, the aid has supported projects, not a sector. The Ministry of Culture must now decide if it wants to treat the podcast as a real sector or maintain it as a marginal artistic laboratory, funded on the fringes but without solid economic prospects.