While the notion of “work-life balance” continues to be presented as an objective to be achieved, a new generation of entrepreneurs pleads for a more realistic approach with a fluid integration between professional commitment and personal life, without frontal opposition.
A myth inherited from the wages
The concept of “work-life balance” is based on a strict separation between two supposedly distinct spheres: work on one side, personal life on the other. He popularized in the 1990s as technology extended the mental presence time to the office, even outside the walls of the company.
But this model, built for linear salaried careers, struggles to apply to the life of an entrepreneur or a manager. The responsibilities do not stop at 6 p.m. The mental charge does not know the RTT. And the idea of compartmentalizing the two dimensions is often similar to an empty injunction.
A more nuanced reality: reasoned integration
Rather than seeking a mechanical balance, often impossible, some choose a integration approach : work and personal life are no longer opposite, but articulated around a common objective of global development.
This implies recognizing that:
-
- The work is part of life, not the other way around.
- An individual professionally accomplished is often more present and balanced in his family life.
- Flexibility (in schedules, places, rhythms) is a more powerful lever than strict separation.
Non -linear but controlled days
Concretely, integration results in “non -continuous” days:
-
- Work very early in the morning, then take a long break to accompany a child or practice a personal activity.
- Accept to respond to emergencies in the evening, while keeping time during the day for non -professional tasks.
- Prioritize the quality of presencerather than the quantity of hours disconnected.
The weekend is no longer necessarily sanctuarized, but it can be if the week has allowed a good balance. The essential is do not undergo the burden, and of power adjust as he pleases.
Freedom, but not relaxation
This model only works if the autonomy goes hand in hand with a great personal requirement. Far from a lax posture, integration involves a fine management of priorities, energy, and attention.
It is also based on a strong transparency with the teamsespecially on flexible working times. In startup environments where the schedules often extend, give the example of an assumed articulation can help to establish a healthier climate.
A border to preserve: that of sleep
Even integration defenders recognize a non -negotiable limit: rest. The truncated nights degrade performance, optimism, lucidity. Sleeping becomes an act of strategic management, as much as a physiological need. As such, integration must not lead to permanent mental availability, but to a Conscious control of his schedule.
What this approach changes for the organization
For companies, promoting integration rather than balance involves:
-
- Of trust The autonomy of employees rather than imposing fixed schedules.
- To measure performance on Results, not schedules.
- To accept that personal times coexist with the professional agenda, as long as the commitments are held.
- To embody this at the highest level, because the posture of managers remains structuring for the whole team.
Retain
-
- Personal pro/life balance is often an illusion for leaders. Integration offers a more realistic framework.
- The objective is not to compartmentalize, but to streamline time management and energy.
- This supposes a high personal discipline, organizational flexibility, and an aligned corporate culture.
- Integration does not sacrifice performance, it is often a condition.
